We don't stop at the checklist.
A single bug is not always the story. We look at what happens when weaknesses are combined — from the first request to account takeover, privilege escalation or access to sensitive data.
We test the places attackers are most likely to test first: the application, the API, the infrastructure and the trust between them. The goal is simple — find something real, prove it, and give your team a clear way to fix it.
HAK-MZ is an independent Offensive Security team. We spend our time looking at real systems, breaking assumptions and following attack paths that automated tools usually miss. When we find something, we show exactly how it works and why it matters.
A single bug is not always the story. We look at what happens when weaknesses are combined — from the first request to account takeover, privilege escalation or access to sensitive data.
We reproduce the issue, validate the impact and document the attack path. No inflated severity, no vague screenshots — just enough evidence to make the problem hard to misunderstand.
The point is not to make a report look impressive. It is to help your team decide what to fix, why it matters and what a realistic attacker could do next.
We tailor the work to the system you actually run — not a generic checklist. That can mean a focused application test, a deeper infrastructure assessment or a full attack simulation.
APPLICATION PENETRATION TESTING
Manual testing of authentication, authorization, business logic, APIs, sessions and the attack paths connecting them.
↗ 02 // CLOUDINFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY
External exposure, network services, cloud configuration, privilege boundaries and escalation paths across modern infrastructure.
↗ 03 // ADVERSARYADVERSARY EMULATION
Objective-driven attack simulations designed to show how a determined attacker could reach sensitive systems, data or business impact.
↗ 04 // AIAI SECURITY ASSESSMENT
Testing AI applications, integrations and agentic workflows for prompt injection, data exposure and unsafe trust boundaries.
↗We start by understanding what matters, then test the assumptions around it. We go as far as the evidence takes us, and we keep the final answer clear enough for both engineers and decision-makers.
The people testing your systems are the people you talk to. Fewer handoffs means better context, faster answers and a much more honest conversation about what we found.
“The useful part of a security test is not the number of findings. It is knowing what an attacker could do next — while you still have time to stop them.”